The Quran expresses the Following:
“Waqawlihim inna qatlna al Massih Issa ibn Maryam rasul Allah, wama qataluhu wama salabuhu walaken shubbiha lahum”, Quran 4: 158. Interpreted: ‘and their truism, we murdered the Messiah, Jesus, child of Mary, the Messenger of Allah; while they slew him not nor killed him, yet he was made to appear to them like the one executed (M. Sher Ali’s interpretation).
On this refrain, Muslim analyst Abdullah Yusuf Ali delivers the accompanying clarification:
‘The finish of the life of Jesus on earth is as much associated with secret as his introduction to the world, and surely most of his private life, aside from the three principle long stretches of his service. It isn’t beneficial to examine the numerous questions and guesses among the early Christian organizations and among Muslim scholars. The Orthodox Christian Churches make it a cardinal purpose of their principle that his life was taken on the Cross, that he kicked the bucket and was covered, that on the third day he rose in the body with his injuries flawless, and strolled about a bantered, and ate with his pupils, and was thereafter taken up substantial to paradise. This is important for the religious principle of blood penance and vicarious penance for sins, which is dismissed by Islam. In any case, a portion of the early Christian groups didn’t really accept that that Christ was executed on the Cross. The Basilidans accepted that another person was fill in for him. The Docetae held that Christ never had a genuine physical or common body, however just an evident or apparition body, and that his Crucifixion was just obvious, not genuine. Tha Marcionite Gospel (about A.D. 138) rejected that Jesus was conceived, and just said that he showed up in human structure. The Gospel of St. Barnabas upheld the hypothesis of replacement on the Cross. The Qur’anic instructing is that Christ was not curified nor slaughtered by the Jews. Despite certain evident conditions which created that fantasy in the brains of a portion of his adversaries; that questions, questions, and guesses on such issues are vain; and that he was taken up to God.’ (Abdullah Yusuf Ali’s analysis # 663, Text, Translation and Commentary by Abdullah Yusuf Ali, the Meaning of the Glorious Qur’an, 2 vols. Distributed by Dar Al-Kitab Al-Masri (Egypt) and Dar Al-Kita Allubnani (Lebanon), 1934).
Execution was authenticated first among the Persians. The Greeks and the Carthaginians, from whom the Romans adjusted the training, later utilized it. In the Old Testament, the cadavers of blasphemers or misguided worshipers rebuffed by stoning may be hanged as additional mortification (Deut. 21: 23).
Execution was presented in Palestine during the Greek time. Josephus, the Jewish history specialist (A.D. 37-100), reveals to us that the Seleucid lord Antiochus IV Epiphanes killed those Jews who rejected Hellenization. The Emperor Constantine, nullified the training in yielding to Christian conviction concerning Jesus’ demise.
Jesus torturous killing is related in Matt. 27, Mark 15, Luke 23, John 19, and commonly alluded to somewhere else in the New Testament. The impact of early Christian writing regarding this matter and others is spread everywhere on the Qur’an. Ali’s discourse with respect to Christian and Gnostic writing is only one illustration of that impact.
Execution was a type of the death penalty. It included public disgrace to the individual being executed. The sentenced must be deprived of all his garments; he was genuinely tormented, and was made to convey his go across along the public streets to the execution ground; at that point he was fastened to the cross, and was the object of insults and outrages from passers-by. Passing by torturous killing brought the censured into a public offensiveness.
Torturous killing gave an impediment in the resulting exertion to change the Jews over to Christianity. The Jews were not set up to acknowledge the possibility that the Messiah, whose coming is recommended in the Old Testament, ought to be executed. To large numbers of them, a particularly thought was viewed as an irreverence. That was presumably the prospect of the Muslim people group, who presented the Hadith convention.
Yet, as opposed to the Hadith understanding of the Qur’anic section, and in opposition to the interpretation referenced above, and to the mistaken translation delivered by Abdullah Yussuf Ali, the Qur’an doesn’t keep the demise and Crucifixion from getting Jesus, the Messiah. Truth be told the Aramaic language of the Qur’an is indistinguishable from the account of Crucifixion referenced in the New Testament.
The Qur’anic formation “w” in “[w]ama” is like Aramaic “w” signifying ‘thus, at that point, and’; Akkadian “u”. The Qur’anic word “wama” has been deciphered incorrectly as ‘didn’t’. Syriac “wmo, or “wma” is an inquisitive pronoun signifies ‘what’. Syriac “wmo li wlokh” or “wma li wlokh” signifies ‘and what have I to do with you’. The Qur’anic stanza, “wama qataluhu” is indistinguishable from Aramaic “wm qtlhu”, Syriac “wmo qatluuy, or wma qatluuy” signifies ‘what they slew’. The Qur’anic section “wama salabuuhu” is indistinguishable from Syriac “wmo salbuuy or wma salbuuy” signifying ‘what they killed’. At the end of the day, the Qur’an is stating: ‘what they slew and what they executed’, an affirmation of the passing and torturous killing of Jesus, the Messiah.
The Qur’anic word “walaaken” has been deciphered wrongly as ‘however’. Aramaic “lkn”. The underlying “l” is a prepostion, it signifies ‘to, for, concerning’. When the postfixes are added, it is articulated ‘li (mine), lokh, or lakh (yours, sing.), leh (his), loh (hers), lan (our own), lkhuun (yours, plural), lkhen (yours, fem. Plu.). At the point when the vowel sign/a/is added to the Syriac “lkhen”, it transforms into “lakhen”, Arabic “laken”, which signifies ‘theirs’. It is essential to remember that the early Qur’anic original copies didn’t utilize the vowel signs. Accordingly the first word utilized in the Qur’an was “lkn” as in Syriac “lken, or lkhen” which means (yours, fem. Plu), which is found in Syriac Peshito (Ezekiel 13: 18) and Biblia Hebraica “lknh” (Eze. 13: 18). The reference to female plural in the Qur’anic section is viable with the Biblical occasions, which are referenced in Matthew 27: 55, which peruses the accompanying: “There were numerous ladies there, looking on from a good ways, who had followed Jesus from Galilee and caused him. Among them were Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James and Joseph, and the spouse of Zebede”.
The Qur’anic word “shubbiha” has been deciphered wrongly as ‘he was made to appear to them like the one killed’. Syriac “shabah” signifies ‘favored’. The Qur’anic relational word “lahum” is equal to Aramaic “lhmh” signifying ‘concerning, regarding’ (Jer. 14: 16).
The right translation is: ‘and they state, we murdered the Messiah, Jesus, child of Mary, the Messenger of Allah, what they slew, and what they executed, and to you (the ones who followed Jesus at the Crucifixion) he is honored and to them (his devotees) also. https://quranteacherbradford.co.uk/
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/201084